Dumping the vote
For the past six months I have been running over the same scenario repeatedly in my head. In essence, it involves the death of voting on social bookmarking sites. The problem is, it gives birth to nothing. At least in my world that is the end result, and I have not an ounce of research to back up the hypothesis. Albeit a risky maneuver, I figure I might as well reinforce my outlandish claims, and be the first to officially dump the vote.
If you expect to uncover a well constructed criticism of voting models, then let me save you some time. You will not find it here. The critique of this content delivery filtering mechanism has been explored far and wide already. All I have to offer is the highly anticipated justification that it simply does not work. The knowledge that is most useful, most interesting, and most thought-provoking to me, does not exist on these Web sites.
I have nothing to gain by pushing for this sweeping reform. The reality is that the majority of the traffic I have ever received has been the result of social bookmarking. I do not deny that there are benefits to content publishers, and that a solid advertising model can be built around submission to these services. However, the primary intended purpose, once altruistic, is now a festering boil in need of a doctor’s lance.
Like so many before me, I do not have the answer to the problem, but I do have an opinion. Again, let me save you some time. It is not the Semantic Web. I still cringe at this vague attempt to organize so much information into a pseudo artificial intelligence. However, the primary benefit of what the Semantic Web promises is exactly what I envision as the next revolution in information discovery and filtering on the Internet.
The next golden ticket will be search assistants that track search history, search preferences, RSS feeds, emails, music preferences, and purchases, and then bring me relevant knowledge as a result of my online behavioral patterns. It sounds like science fiction, and a security nightmare. Yet, this deep level of personalization will help people to discover hidden information that is deemed important by their standard, not standards defined by the populous.
So what exactly does it mean to dump the vote? Not a single vote will ever be cast by me again on Digg, Reddit, DZone, Hacker News, Mixx, Propeller, or any other social bookmarking Web site. DZone may be the only site that creeps into my RSS reader, but overall, I will be shunning any network that plays the voting game. Mock as you might — I will not be the one to vote up your retort.
Leave a Comment
Comments are moderated. No profanity. Only <a>...</a>, <blockquote>...</blockquote>, and <code>...</code> are allowed.
Seperate paragraphs by pressing the "Enter" key twice, or press it once to break to a new line.
4 Comments
#01, Jun 07 2008
Dan Shields
I didn’t know you voted on those sites. I never vote for anything except your articles. I just read the articles on them. I don’t like any of the sites besides Dzone and now Sphinn for marketing stuff. But its not about the articles that have the most votes its just about having access to articles that interest me that I might not of been able to discover on my own.
And you will still vote my articles on Dzone right? LOL
#02, Jun 07 2008
Brian
I certainly was not an obsessive voter. The loss of my vote will not cripple the system, nor will it prevent you from making the front page of DZone :)
#03, Jun 09 2008
Mike Desjardins
Wow - I’ve been a fan of your site for a long time, and I stumbled across it via dzone or Hacker News or one of the vote-based sites you mentioned.
I agree with a lot of your sentiment, but I’m not quite willing to give up those sites yet! I’ve found that they’re useful for pointing me at interesting RSS feeds, and I’m starting to lean more and more on my RSS reader, and less and less on the voting sites. Perhaps someday I’ll achieve web news nirvana, and be able to forgo the voting sites as you have!
#04, Jun 09 2008
Steve
Digg++ !
(couldn’t resist)
I gather what you’re saying, and I realize “the system” is flawed, but I must confess there are parts of it that work.
As a “Digger”, when I’m on Digg I see what my friends (friends == people I actually physically know, not just online handles) have found interesting.
For me, I find this handy since I don’t have the time to read every link out there, I can easily pick 2 or 3 that my friends have already “verified” as interesting and read those while I wait for a build, coffee, rip, burn or a download to finish.
Seeing that “534″ people Dugg a story doesn’t phase me…
Alas, you are right though… I want content served up to me based on my “activity history”… if I spend 80% of my time looking at links about PHP, JavaScript, jQuery, CSS, Linux, Apache & Web 2.0, then I would ideally like content brought to me, that matches this.
Final note. I hate DZone’s site because I get 1 line of a story, a full page of ads, and have to sift through lots of stuff to find the article… its almost as bad as “experts exchange” where you get all kinds of links from google for answers to questions, only to find out that you can’t get the answer you want without forking over cash.